|
| |
|
 |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| Everywhere we turn today,
we see, read or hear the phrase Return on Investment (ROI).
Do a Google search on "Return On |
 |
Investment" and
more than 7,000,000 results appear, ranging from ROI on training1 to
ROI on Needle and Syringe programs in Australia2.
So why all the fuss about ROI?
Simply put: expense control,
cost reductions, revenue enhancement and productivity gains.
Leaders need to know |
that their investment
has value. Shareholders and investors are holding C-Level
executives' feet
to the fire
about unnecessary spending. Those executives in turn are
holding their direct reports' feet to the fire. No one is
spared. Everyone must prove a positive return on the investment
from the finance department to IT to procurement to meeting
planners.
The ROI for capital investments such as major technology
purchases, outsourcing services and annual vendor contracts
are computed and submitted for approval every day. Relatively
speaking, they are a snap to compute. However, the ROI of
a meeting has always been controversial. Certainly, the cost
to produce the meeting is known. It's the "Was it worth it?" question
that continues to lurk in |
|
|
the
minds of senior management and its surrogate for examining costs, the
procurement executive.
Meeting specialists traditionally used surveys pre and post meeting to measure the success of meetings in response to the "worth it" question. Survey questions typically ask about the quality of the presentations, the meeting venue, the food and other components of the meeting, such as external presenters. Frankly, these surveys are "smiley" sheets.
Smiley Sheets Are Out; Measurable Results Are
In
Senior business executives want measurable results, not smiley sheets. The key phrase here is Measurable Results. For those meetings that have objectives (desired outcomes) which cannot be measured in "cold, hard cash," such as increased revenues, the meeting design and process are critical to identifying the data needed to measure the worth of the meeting. Flip charts, electronic whiteboards and automatic response systems (wireless handheld voting terminals) are tools that have been traditionally used at meetings to capture and record participants' input. ARS devices are excellent for "checking the pulse" of a group, determining the group's priorities, or getting an idea of a group's aggregate estimate of its annual sales target. However, for the type of extensive data capture that must be analyzed and measured to determine a meeting's ROI, these tools fall short. For example, data written on flip charts and whiteboards must be deciphered, re-recorded, then compared and combined for examination, post-meeting. In this 24/7 world, the longer it takes to process, interpret, compile into an electronic file, and analyze, its value to the organization diminishes as each day, week and month of compilation goes by. ARS results are instantaneous but the answers are pre-determined by the content developer who created the questions. One really cannot get into the nuances of the answers, nor can any other answers be recorded or tabulated.
The point that I'm making here is that these traditional meeting aids
cannot grab every person's thoughts, every person's innovative idea,
every person's suggestion, or every person's objection, even if the
entire meeting and its breakout sessions were audio-recorded. Aside
from the time it would take to transcribe the entire meeting – anywhere
from a week to a month, there is another far more compelling reason
why audio-recording falls far short. It's known as "The Usual Suspects"
Phenomenon. This refers to the dominant few who hog the microphones
at every meeting in the general sessions, and the magic markers in
the workshops and breakout sessions. Then the "I Don't Want to Ask
a Dumb Question" Phenomenon sets in -- the rest of the participants
become intimidated for the rest of the meeting are mute.
UNISON – The Power to Record, Track and Compute Instantaneously
UNISON the collaborative meeting experience™. has become the
pre-eminent tool for instantaneous, comprehensive data
capture. With UNISON, content developers have the freedom
to design interactive sessions without the limitations posed by traditional
meeting aids because interactivity and collaboration happens simultaneously
throughout the meeting room. The data from these sessions is recorded
and categorized for review instantaneously. Ideas from brainstorming
and consensus-building sessions – whether in the general session or
breakout sessions, are fully documented and instantly retrievable.
All intellectual property (data and thinking) is captured, examined,
prioritized and shared, during the meeting. "Hard" data such as revenue
predictions and product sales estimates and test scores are recorded,
computed and shared instantaneously. "Soft" data such as agreed-upon
strategic goals, tactical action plans and individual commitments are
recorded, categorized and shared, again instantaneously. A complete
record of the entire meeting from general session to workshops to breakout
sessions is at hand instantly!
A CASE IN POINT
The largest mutual insurance provider in the UK, Standard Life Assurance
Group, undertook a complete strategic review of its services, market
position and economic viability. As a result, a change program was
implemented which substantially reduced operating costs, a reduction
in staff and the development of new profitable business propositions.
The firm's largest sales division, recently renamed and reorganized,
wanted to hold a meeting of its staff. The meeting had three objectives:
to layout the revamped strategy of the division, to bond its employees
into a unit under the division's new brand name and to give its employees "a
say" in the values, mission and challenges that faced the division.
UNISON™ was used throughout a four-hour extremely intensive interactive
session to capture the desired data: all questions, all comments, all
thinking and the final choices for the division's values. UNISON also
was used continuously throughout the day-long session to calculate
and update team scores of competitions that were held during the interactive
session and the physical competitions that made up the rest of the
day's agenda. By using UNISON and its extensive capabilities (interactive,
collaborative, computing, record keeping), Standard Life not only fully
engaged its employees in the change program, it had at its disposal
anytime during the meeting, the fully recorded meeting data. Not only
were delegates' thoughts shared instantaneously throughout the interactive
session, the complete data was posted at the company's website and
used by managers to help shape plans for their employees, post event.
For a more detailed description of the Standard Life meeting experience,
please see the Standard
Life case study .
What's the Bottom Line?
As shown in the Standard Life example and other case
studies,
UNISON can help answer the question, "Was the meeting worth it?" Bottom
line, though, is that in order for UNISON to be instrumental in measuring
a meeting's ROI, five things have to happen.
The first is that prior
to the meeting, its desired outcomes must be defined. In other words,
what exactly do you want the participants to do, to understand, to
learn or to commit to.
The second is meeting input – data, thinking,
sales revenue projections, commitments, scores - have to be recorded
fully.
The third is that the defined outcomes and the meeting input
have to be tracked and compared. A team of content developers must
be dedicated and held responsible for this during the meeting. If the
participants are not ‘getting it,' they can adjust the design on the
spot. Imagine doing this in a non-UNISON meeting. It can be done, but
it can take quite a while to do it. With UNISON, it happens within
seconds and minutes.
The fourth is the next to most critical, and is
the least or never done, in my experience. It's follow-up and tracking
the recorded data, post meeting. Imagine you've had your annual strategic
update meeting with your top sales force. And imagine that you've gotten
a commitment from each one of them to estimate their next year's sales.
UNISON aggregates all the totals by group, by regional sales team and
by individual. Post meeting, these data are tracked and compared to the actual figures. No matter what the outcome, there would be proof to analyze the meeting's worth.
The fifth is the most critical. It's having the courage to design
a highly collaborative meeting in which the participants share in the
outcome of the meeting. I have heard senior executives say very bluntly
during planning sessions, "I don't want my people having a say
in the meeting. I want to tell them what they have to do and that's
it."
It takes a very brave meeting process designer and a very forward-thinking senior executive who not only spouts the notion of teamwork and collaboration but also actually lives it to hold a meeting that has UNISON in it. My experience has been that once senior executives see and experience the power of UNISON, they never want to have a meeting without it. What drives these senior executives to want to use UNISON? They see results.
Larry Cerri, Founder and President, UNISON LLC
|
1. For more information on how ROI is used to measure the investment on training programs, see http://www.learnativity.com/roi-learning.html
2. For more information on how ROI is used in measuring the
effectiveness of needle and syringe programs in Australia, see http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/publicat/document/metadata/roireport.htm. |
|